Case study / Steam boiler room

Fako: less fuel.Heat exchange recovered.

Deposits and frequent cleaning revealed a water quality problem. We descaled the boiler, adjusted the parameters and launched KCAQUA 303 to maintain the result during daily operation.

  • Steam boiler Fako
  • Chemical decalification
  • KCAQUA 303 and monitoring
See implementation progress

Diagnosis of boiler room

The sediment was a symptom.The source was water.

One-time cleaning didn't solve the cause. At the same time, water quality, blowdown and dosing had to be arranged.

8 °n

Hard feedwater

The hardness of 8°n was conducive to rapid accumulation of sediment on heating surfaces.

Supply Water
4200 μS

Too high conductivity

The conductivity of 4200 μS increased the risk of sediments and hindered blowdown control.

Boiler operation
3 months.

Frequent cleaning

Short cycles between cleanings burdened maintenance and hindered work planning.

Availability

Workflow

From sludge removalfor stable work.

We first restored the heat-transfer surface. We then set up a programme that limits the conditions promoting renewed scale formation.

Water analysis and inspection

We checked the hardness, conductivity, pH and condition of the heating surfaces.

Chemical descaling

The right process dissolved the sediment without dismantling the system and restored the heat exchange surface.

Startup KCAQUA 303

We've determined the dosage, the parameters and the response to the deviations.

Monitoring after implementation

We compare water parameters, media consumption and clean-up intervals.

Data result

Less fuel.Longer boiler work.

The change was assessed not by the appearance of the installation, but by parameters, fuel consumption and intervals between subsequent cleaning.

0
Fuel

Reduced consumption after heat exchange recovery

The comparison was referred to the boiler work before implementation.

42002800 μS
Conductivity

Safer water running range

The parameter stopped obstructing blowdown control.

312 meat.
Maintenance

Longer cycle between cleaning

Less intervention and easier planning of boiler room work.

The values are exemplary. The actual effect depends on fuel, load, boiler condition and water quality.

Maintaining effect

Program maintains effectafter cleaning.

We're not just preparing a recipe for the boiler room. We determine what to measure, when to react and how to show the result to the technician and board.

Parameters instead of conjectures

The hardness, conductivity, pH and operational data shall be measured in a fixed reference system.

Boiler dose

dosing and blowdown are not based on a one-off setting, but on current observation.

Report ready for decision

We compare the trend of parameters with fuel, water and maintenance requirements.

Implementation FAQ

Questions Beforesimilar implementation.

Below we respond specifically, without promises that cannot be confirmed in the data.

Does boiler descaling require a long shutdown?

The range depends on the state of installation and cleaning technology. First we evaluate sediment, material and working conditions, and then we set a safe time and course of work.

Can scale return after cleaning?

Yes, if the water quality and the way of the boiler is not changed. Therefore, cleaning is combined with the KCAQUA program, parameters control and dosing monitoring.

How do you verify the impact on fuel consumption?

We compare data from before and after implementation, taking into account boiler load, steam production, fuel quality and changes in process. The drop alone is not sufficient for a fair conclusion.

A similar subject at the bet?

Let's start with what's going on in your boiler room.

Just a description of the problem and basic data. The engineer will help you decide whether you need to first measure, clean or change the program.